Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Electric Vehicles

The End of Range Anxiety Is in Sight

Who even wants to drive more than 400 miles without taking a break to recharge — literally or metaphorically?

•
An EV with range.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

Take a moment to ask yourself: When was the last time you drove 300-plus miles without stopping? For reference, that means tackling a five- or six-hour journey, like L.A. to San Francisco or Houston to New Orleans, in one shot. Unless you have a bladder of steel and an obsession with making good time, there’s a good chance you’re making at least one pit stop on the way.

But if you wanted to, soon you could drive that far in one shot without burning gas.

Electric cars are reaching a point where such trips are nearly within reach. A few years ago, many if not most consumer EVs came with 200-some miles per charge. Then many automakers introduced the option to pay more for the longer-range battery, which extended driving range to 300 miles or more. Suddenly, more models have begun to top the 400-mile plateau.

The latest eye-popping range number comes from the 2027 BMW i3. This is the fully electrified version of the brand’s 3 Series, one of the icons of the automotive world. The launch version of that car comes with 440 miles of range, per the Environmental Protection Agency’s rating. It joins vehicles such as the Lucid Air, Chevy Silverado EV Extended Range, and Rivian’s Dual Max trucks and SUVs in topping 400 miles of maximum range. These are high-end EVs out of the reach of most buyers. Yet their mere availability suggests an automotive tipping point: At that point, an EV can go about as far as you’d even want to travel without a break.

To understand the importance of this milestone, remember what range numbers really mean. The EPA’s rating comes from testing an EV over a variety of driving conditions, from city stop-and-go to interstate road tripping. If you do all your driving around town, or stick to the speed limit on a 55-mile-per-hour country highway, then you might reach your car’s mileage estimate. But speed kills range. Fly down the freeway at 70 miles per hour and you won’t come anywhere close to the stated maximum.

Real-world testing makes this abundantly clear. The new Chevrolet Bolt is rated at 262 miles, impressive for a little car. Traveling 75 miles per hour, though, it makes a hair under 200 miles. In a much, much bigger vehicle, Chevy’s engineers got the Silverado EV to go 1,000 miles on a single charge by driving it 25 miles per hour; at realistic speeds, it might go 400-some. My own Tesla Model 3 has made the speed penalty abundantly clear over the years. Initially rated at 240 miles, it has never been able to travel more than about 150 miles at speeds above 70 miles per hour. Keep in mind that charging speed slows drastically as the battery approaches full. On a road trip, you’ll recharge only to 80% or 90% of capacity because it’s not worth it to wait 10 or 20 minutes for the last trickle of electricity.

The upshot: You want your EV to start with a big range number, because the number shrinks. The EPA rating is just a starting point — one that invariably wanes as the years go by. An EV with 400-plus miles of range will still have 300-some when it gets old. That’s a huge deal compared to the previous generation: Older cars that started in the 200s might see road trips become annoying ordeals if they drop below 200 “miles” per charge.

Three years ago this month, I wrote that people should buy as much EPA range as they could afford and that 300 was the magic number. That way, the real-world range you probably care about most — how long you can drive down the interstate without stopping — is at least 200 actual miles. After three hours on the road, you might be ready for a 20 or 30-minute break to stretch your legs and recharge the battery, anyway.

The arrival of more 400-mile ranges pushes EVs even closer to parity with combustion vehicles when it comes to road trip convenience. The more miles you have to work with, the more your trips and stops are decided by your own happiness and comfort rather than by the need to wait for more juice. Remember, too, that used EVs are all the rage right now as Americans seek affordable ways to avoid paying for gasoline. An older EV’s remaining range matters a lot to its second and third owner. A car that starts with 400 miles of range might still deliver an acceptable number of miles per charge even when it has hundreds of thousands of miles on the odometer.

The other thing is, battery capacity isn’t just about driving. An EV can use its stored energy for just about anything: to air-condition the dog while you eat dinner in a non-dog-friendly restaurant, to back up your home’s power supply during a blackout, to keep everyone comfortable and entertained while you wait in the parking lot, or to use its cameras to record footage of anyone who might mess with the vehicle. The more range, the more an EV can use energy for other purposes and still have plenty saved for driving.

Of course, the most powerful upshot of 400-mile electric cars is the death of range anxiety. The fear of running out of juice in the middle of nowhere — or of making an annoying number of charging stops with a lower-range EV — has kept many electric-curious buyers away. Many are turning back toward hybrid cars and even the forthcoming wave of extended-range EVs that use a gas engine as a backup generator. But worries about range and the steady but slow growth of America’s charging networks start to fade away when you realize many gasoline-burning cars would run out of fuel before your 400-mile EV hits empty.

Green
🔒

You’ve reached your free article limit

Subscribe to Heatmap News for unlimited access to daily energy and climate coverage.
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Q&A

Why the Wilderness Society Backs a Data Center Moratorium

Talking with Dan Hartinger, the land conservation group’s senior policy director.

The Q&A subject.
Heatmap Illustration

This week’s Q&A is with Dan Hartinger, senior policy director for The Wilderness Society, a prominent land conservation organization in D.C. that this week called for a moratorium on data center development on public land. The public statement was relatively scant on details about the group’s stance, and a decade of reporting on policy in Washington has taught me that its positions are quite influential, especially in more traditional outdoor recreation and conservationist circles that are also often bipartisan. So I reached out and asked if someone could further explain the society’s position, and Dan obliged.

The following chat was lightly edited for clarity.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Hotspots

Data Center Outrage Catches Up to Renewables Outrage in Michigan

Plus more of the week’s biggest development fights.

The United States.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

1. Central Michigan – I regret to inform you of this back-and-forth between candidates running for Congress and a would-be constituent because it’s a warning sign for the renewable energy sector (and sort of broke my brain).

  • This week brought the first and likely only debate between Rep. Tom Barrett and Sunrise Movement cofounder Will Lawrence, who are locked in a tight contest over the Michigan 7th congressional district. As I’ve written, their race is a must-watch not only for control of the U.S. House but also the political fortunes of the data center sector.
  • The debate contained a remarkable exchange: Moderators played taped remarks from Paula Caltrider, identified as “a local resident” in the city of Mason to ask the candidates a question about data centers. Instead, she offered a comment. “You know, you can’t be a part of this no data center movement without renouncing the large solar farms and dangerous battery storage facilities that power these data centers.” (Quick TL;DR on Caltrider: She’s been quoted in national media coverage of the data center backlash and last year won a legal settlement after allegedly being fired for refusing a vaccine mandate.)
  • Barrett then ran with Caltrider’s baton. “I appreciate Paula linking these together, the stripping away of local control that took place in pursuit of this Green New Deal agenda in Lansing that took away control from communities” – a reference to the state’s primacy law that other Michigan Republican candidates have opposed.
  • Lawrence, whose support for a federal data center moratorium made him a national political test case, did not take the bait, nor did he criticize renewable energy. Instead, this part of the debate became a tit-for-tat about whether the sitting congressman once backed tax breaks for data centers. “He stuck his finger up into the wind, saw which way it was blowing, did a complete 180 on this issue,” Lawrence said. Then Barrett and Lawrence got into a confusing back-and-forth about whether the Inflation Reduction Act was a giveaway to data centers.
  • To the best of my knowledge, this is the first time the Data Center Trojan Horse has reared its ugly head on any kind of prominent debate stage, but it won’t be the last. For example: The Wisconsin gubernatorial debate is Oct. 21, and we’ve warned you about that one.

2. Doña Ana County, New Mexico – I suggest you pay closer attention to the federal permitting fight playing out over Oracle’s Project Jupiter.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Spotlight

The Data Center Backlash Is Coming for Permitting Reform

The Senate’s compromise bill enters the chat at a moment when federal land and anti-pipeline advocates are already quite activated.

The Capitol and a data center.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

The AI data center backlash is getting louder in D.C. ahead of the midterms – and it’s poised to collide head-on with the new permitting reform deal being negotiated in Congress.

This week, major environmental advocacy organizations are taking large public steps to lean in on the data center fight. The League of Conservation Voters and Natural Resources Defense Council, I’ve been told, are imminently announcing a $250,000 ad buy in the Washington, D.C. market focused entirely on decrying fossil fuel-powered data centers and Trump administration policies to speed up their construction. The Wilderness Society, a prominent land conservation organization, announced it now supports a moratorium against data centers on “public lands” focused on the roughly half billion acres under the Interior Department’s stewardship. And Earthjustice on Thursday did a detailed report claiming that 80% of the data centers under development “bringing their own power” are going to rely on gas generation.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow