Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

Politics

The EPA Wants to Gut Its Research Office

On environmental science, violent tornadoes, and more bad news for Tesla

The EPA Wants to Gut Its Research Office
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

Current conditions: Flash flooding in southern Spain forced evacuations • Tropical Storm Jude displaced thousands of people in Madagascar, Malawi, and Mozambique • Huge swathes of Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas, and Missouri are under red flag warnings today as strong winds bring another day of extreme fire weather to the region.

THE TOP FIVE

1. The EPA aims to get rid of its research arm

The Environmental Protection Agency reportedly plans to eliminate a department that conducts essential research and informs environmental policy. The Office of Research and Development is the agency’s largest department and has studied everything from fine particle pollution in the air to the health risks of fracking and forever chemicals. Its closure would cut up to 1,155 research jobs and “serve the Trump administration’s dual goals of reducing the size of government while potentially easing the regulation of the chemical and fossil fuel industries,” as The New York Times put it.

The move may also face legal hurdles. Rep. Zoe Lofgren of California, the top Democrat on the House science committee, said the office was created by congressional statute and cannot just be dissolved. She added that gutting the department would prevent the EPA from fulfilling its legal responsibilities to use cutting-edge science to shape policy. “Every decision EPA makes must be in furtherance of protecting human health and the environment, and that just can’t happen if you gut EPA science,” Lofgren said in a statement.

In other EPA news, the agency failed to meet a judge’s Monday deadline to provide clear and direct evidence of waste, fraud, or abuse by nonprofit groups approved for $20 billion in climate grants under the Inflation Reduction Act’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, which Administrator Lee Zeldin has been attempting to terminate. Instead, the agency pointed to “unidentified media reports” and an undercover video of an EPA staffer discussing the Biden administration’s rush to get federal grants out the door before the Trump administration took over. Zeldin first froze the funds and then canceled the loans entirely, prompting lawsuits from several of the grantees.

2. DOE releases $57 million loan for Palisades nuclear plant restoration

The Department of Energy yesterday released $57 million to Holtec to help restore and restart carbon-free power generation at the Palisades Nuclear Plant in Michigan, which shuttered in 2022. This is the second disbursement, following the January release of $38 million (the total loan guarantee is for up to $1.52 billion). The loan was approved during the Biden administration under the Inflation Reduction Act’s Energy Infrastructure Reinvestment program, though the Trump administration was quick to take credit. “Today’s action is yet another step toward advancing President Trump’s commitment to increase domestic energy production, bolster our security, and lower costs for the American people,” Energy Secretary Chris Wright said in a release that avoids any mention of the words “clean” or “carbon” or “emissions.” So long as Holtec can get the necessary permits, the Palisades facility will be the first commercial nuclear reactor in the U.S. to restart, and will “support or retain” 600 jobs and provide 800 megawatts of power in Michigan.

3. Weekend storm spawns rare EF4 tornadoes

The deadly storm system that ripped across the South and Midwest over the weekend spawned at least two EF4 tornadoes in Arkansas, according to the National Weather Service. These are some of the most violent tornadoes, representing the second-highest level on the Enhanced Fujita scale used to rate tornado strength, with wind speeds from 166 to 200 miles per hour EF4s are also the rarest tornadoes, accounting for just 0.5% of all tornadoes in the U.S. between 2000 and 2022. Early damage surveys indicate one tornado ran for an hour, crossing 46 miles through two counties, with winds up to 170 miles per hour; another tornado had a path of 14.5 miles, a max width of one mile, and wind speeds reaching 190 miles per hour. Luckily no one seems to have been killed in these two twisters, though there were several injuries. But the larger tornado outbreak left at least 24 people dead and destroyed hundreds of homes across 12 states.

4. More bad news for Tesla

Trade tensions between Canada and the U.S. have prompted Toronto’s mayor to stop offering drivers financial incentives to buy Tesla vehicles for ride shares or taxis. “There are other electric cars they could purchase,” said Mayor Olivia Chow. “If you want to buy a Tesla, go ahead, but don’t count on taxpayer money to subsidize it.” She told Reuters the move was a direct response to Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s involvement with the Trump administration.

Meanwhile, insurance experts warn that an increase in acts of vandalism targeting Teslas may prompt insurers to hike rates for the vehicles. “Tesla owners better buckle up,” wrote Rob Stumpf at InsideEVs. “Things could get worse before they get better — at least while Musk lives a double-life as part-time CEO and part-time head of state.”

And finally, car listings data suggests prices for used Teslas are falling three times faster than the used car market overall. “So much for Tesla vehicles becoming ‘appreciating assets,’” wrote Fred Lambert at Electrek.

5. German court to hear arguments in climate lawsuit between a Peruvian farmer and an energy giant

A German court will hear testimony this week in a longstanding climate lawsuit that could hold major greenhouse gas polluters financially responsible for their contributions to climate change. The case was filed in 2015 by a Peruvian farmer named Saúl Luciano Lliuya, who argues that German multinational energy giant RWE is partly to blame for rising flood risks in his village of Huaraz due to a melting glacier. He wants the company to pay for flood prevention measures. In 2022, court judges flew from Germany to the Peruvian Andes to observe the melting glacier and collect evidence for the case, “a global first for any climate case,” The Washington Post reported at the time. The report also noted that if the lawsuit succeeded, “major polluters anywhere may be liable for the increasingly disastrous consequences of greenhouse gas emissions.”

THE KICKER

A new study finds that beef from grass-fed cattle does not have a lower carbon footprint than beef from cattle fed grains and corn. “I have a hard time imagining … a situation in which it will prove environmentally, genuinely wise, genuinely beneficial, to raise beef,” said study author Gidon Eshel, a research professor of environmental physics at Bard College.

Yellow

You’re out of free articles.

Subscribe today to experience Heatmap’s expert analysis 
of climate change, clean energy, and sustainability.
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Energy

The EPA’s Backdoor Move to Hobble the Carbon Capture Industry

Why killing a government climate database could essentially gut a tax credit

Lee Zeldin.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

The Trump administration’s bid to end an Environmental Protection Agency program may essentially block any company — even an oil firm — from accessing federal subsidies for capturing carbon or producing hydrogen fuel.

On Friday, the Environmental Protection Agency proposed that it would stop collecting and publishing greenhouse gas emissions data from thousands of refineries, power plants, and factories across the country.

Keep reading...Show less
Blue
Adaptation

The ‘Buffer’ That Can Protect a Town from Wildfires

Paradise, California, is snatching up high-risk properties to create a defensive perimeter and prevent the town from burning again.

Homes as a wildfire buffer.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

The 2018 Camp Fire was the deadliest wildfire in California’s history, wiping out 90% of the structures in the mountain town of Paradise and killing at least 85 people in a matter of hours. Investigations afterward found that Paradise’s town planners had ignored warnings of the fire risk to its residents and forgone common-sense preparations that would have saved lives. In the years since, the Camp Fire has consequently become a cautionary tale for similar communities in high-risk wildfire areas — places like Chinese Camp, a small historic landmark in the Sierra Nevada foothills that dramatically burned to the ground last week as part of the nearly 14,000-acre TCU September Lightning Complex.

More recently, Paradise has also become a model for how a town can rebuild wisely after a wildfire. At least some of that is due to the work of Dan Efseaff, the director of the Paradise Recreation and Park District, who has launched a program to identify and acquire some of the highest-risk, hardest-to-access properties in the Camp Fire burn scar. Though he has a limited total operating budget of around $5.5 million and relies heavily on the charity of local property owners (he’s currently in the process of applying for a $15 million grant with a $5 million match for the program) Efseaff has nevertheless managed to build the beginning of a defensible buffer of managed parkland around Paradise that could potentially buy the town time in the case of a future wildfire.

Keep reading...Show less
Spotlight

How the Tax Bill Is Empowering Anti-Renewables Activists

A war of attrition is now turning in opponents’ favor.

Massachusetts and solar panels.
Heatmap Illustration/Library of Congress, Getty Images

A solar developer’s defeat in Massachusetts last week reveals just how much stronger project opponents are on the battlefield after the de facto repeal of the Inflation Reduction Act.

Last week, solar developer PureSky pulled five projects under development around the western Massachusetts town of Shutesbury. PureSky’s facilities had been in the works for years and would together represent what the developer has claimed would be one of the state’s largest solar projects thus far. In a statement, the company laid blame on “broader policy and regulatory headwinds,” including the state’s existing renewables incentives not keeping pace with rising costs and “federal policy updates,” which PureSky said were “making it harder to finance projects like those proposed near Shutesbury.”

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow