Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

The Insiders Survey

When Will Global Emissions Peak? And More Predictions From Our Climate Experts.

The future is getting more extreme.

Warm temperatures.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

2025 was a tough year for the climate agenda. President Trump returned to office in January and promptly rolled back many of his predecessor’s decarbonization policies. In July, Congress passed the One Beautiful Bill Act, which repealed key provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act. Permits for offshore wind and solar projects are stuck in limbo.

To gauge how year-to-year fluctuations in politics, policy, and the physical realities of climate change are affecting our experts’ predictions on climate change, we included a series of questions in our annual Insiders Survey designed to take their collective temperature on a few key questions:

  • How much will global average temperatures have risen by 2100?
  • In what year will global greenhouse gas emissions peak?
  • In what decade will China’s greenhouse gas emissions peak?
  • In what decade will the United States reach net zero?

We’re now on Year 2 of the survey. So have climate experts drastically changed their outlooks compared to last year?

On average, not much. But the extremes have gotten bigger — some told us they were feeling quite rosy, while others were even more deeply concerned.

Here’s what they told us:

The average answer stayed the same as last year: 2.8 degrees Celsius.

This year, however, the range got bigger. While last year every expert gave an answer between 2 and 3.5 degrees, this year’s high estimate was 5.5 degrees. Optimism also increased — at least for the climate investor this year who said 1.5 degrees.

An environmental researcher told us two main questions will determine how much temperatures actually rise: “Can we get our act together? And how sensitive is the climate to what we’re doing?”

An academic told us warming will be catastrophic if we continue on our current path. “But,” they said, “I think it’s never too late for us to become serious about addressing the climate crisis.”

Last year the average answer was 2039. This time, it’s 2044 — a significant increase. And once again, insiders diverged more than last year.

“It could be this year,” the environmental researcher told us. “The renewables rollout is exponentially growing. A lot of the stuff that China said that they would build is not being built, in terms of coal, etc.”

On the other extreme, two insiders think that global emissions may never peak.

“They will?” one replied when we asked them our question. “They won’t,” another told us. “They flatten out. They go down a little, then up a little. But they don’t peak, at least not before 2100.”

China — currently the world’s largest emitter — has seen its climate pollution plateau in the past few years. Our insiders have taken note.

Last year, 30% of insiders said China’s emissions would peak in the 2020s. This year, a slightly higher share of respondents agreed. Among researchers and reformers, a slight majority said the 2020s.

"I think they already have,” a climate investor told us.

Once again, the most common expert among respondents was that the United States will reach net zero in the 2060s. Yet as with the other questions, insiders’ views have drifted apart.

Last year, only one expert replied 2100 or later. This time, one in six experts said 2100 and beyond — or never.

“I just don’t see the politics aligning with that,” another academic told us. “Let’s say you would have to do substantial amounts of direct air capture, probably, at that point.”

Meanwhile, “God only knows!” one climate advocate told us.

The Heatmap Insiders Survey of 55 invited expert respondents was conducted by Heatmap News reporters during November and December 2025. Responses were collected via phone interviews. All participants were given the opportunity to record responses anonymously. Not all respondents answered all questions.

You’re out of free articles.

Subscribe today to experience Heatmap’s expert analysis 
of climate change, clean energy, and sustainability.
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Climate Tech

Funding Friday: Google Locks Down 20 Years of Data Center Power

This week is light on the funding, heavy on the deals.

Charging a Rivian.
Heatmap Illustration/EnergyHub, Getty Images

This week’s Funding Friday is light on the funding but heavy on the deals. In the past few days, electric carmaker Rivian and virtual power plant platform EnergyHub teamed up to integrate EV charging into EnergyHub’s distributed energy management platform; the power company AES signed 20-year power purchase agreements with Google to bring a Texas data center online; and microgrid company Scale acquired Reload, a startup that helps get data centers — and the energy infrastructure they require — up and running as quickly as possible. Even with venture funding taking a backseat this week, there’s never a dull moment.

Rivian Partners with EnergyHub for Grid-Friendly EV Charging

Ahead of the Rivian R2’s launch later this year, the EV-maker has partnered with EnergyHub, a company that aggregates distributed energy resources into virtual power plants, to give drivers the opportunity to participate in utility-managed charging programs. These programs coordinate the timing and rate of EV charging to match local grid conditions, enabling drivers to charge when prices are low and clean energy is abundant while avoiding periods of peak demand that would stress the distribution grid.

Keep reading...Show less
Blue
AM Briefing

Trump’s Reactor Realism

On the solar siege, New York’s climate law, and radioactive data center

A nuclear reactor.
Heatmap Illustration/Georgia Power

Current conditions: A rain storm set to dump 2 inches of rain across Alabama, Tennessee, Georgia, and the Carolinas will quench drought-parched woodlands, tempering mounting wildfire risk • The soil on New Zealand’s North Island is facing what the national forecast called a “significant moisture deficit” after a prolonged drought • Temperatures in Odessa, Texas, are as much as 20 degrees Fahrenheit hotter than average.

THE TOP FIVE

1. Trump’s plan to build 10 new large reactors is making headway

For all its willingness to share in the hype around as-yet-unbuilt small modular reactors and microreactors, the Trump administration has long endorsed what I like to call reactor realism. By that, I mean it embraces the need to keep building more of the same kind of large-scale pressurized water reactors we know how to construct and operate while supporting the development and deployment of new technologies. In his flurry of executive orders on nuclear power last May, President Donald Trump directed the Department of Energy to “prioritize work with the nuclear energy industry to facilitate” 5 gigawatts of power uprates to existing reactors “and have 10 new large reactors with complete designs under construction by 2030.” The record $26 billion loan the agency’s in-house lender — the Loan Programs Office, recently renamed the Office of Energy Dominance Financing — gave to Southern Company this week to cover uprates will fulfill the first part of the order. Now the second part is getting real. In a scoop on Thursday, Heatmap’s Robinson Meyer reported that the Energy Department has started taking meetings with utilities and developers of what he said “would almost certainly be AP1000s, a third-generation reactor produced by Westinghouse capable of producing up to 1.1 gigawatts of electricity per unit.”

Keep reading...Show less
Green
Podcast

The Peril of Talking About Electricity Affordability

Rob sits down with Jane Flegal, an expert on all things emissions policy, to dissect the new electricity price agenda.

Power lines.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

As electricity affordability has risen in the public consciousness, so too has it gone up the priority list for climate groups — although many of their proposals are merely repackaged talking points from past political cycles. But are there risks of talking about affordability so much, and could it distract us from the real issues with the power system?

Rob is joined by Jane Flegal, a senior fellow at the Searchlight Institute and the States Forum. Flegal was the former senior director for industrial emissions at the White House Office of Domestic Climate Policy, and she has worked on climate policy at Stripe. She was recently executive director of the Blue Horizons Foundation.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow