Sign In or Create an Account.

By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy

The Insiders Survey

When Will Global Emissions Peak? And More Predictions From Our Climate Experts.

The future is getting more extreme.

Warm temperatures.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

2025 was a tough year for the climate agenda. President Trump returned to office in January and promptly rolled back many of his predecessor’s decarbonization policies. In July, Congress passed the One Beautiful Bill Act, which repealed key provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act. Permits for offshore wind and solar projects are stuck in limbo.

To gauge how year-to-year fluctuations in politics, policy, and the physical realities of climate change are affecting our experts’ predictions on climate change, we included a series of questions in our annual Insiders Survey designed to take their collective temperature on a few key questions:

  • How much will global average temperatures have risen by 2100?
  • In what year will global greenhouse gas emissions peak?
  • In what decade will China’s greenhouse gas emissions peak?
  • In what decade will the United States reach net zero?

We’re now on Year 2 of the survey. So have climate experts drastically changed their outlooks compared to last year?

On average, not much. But the extremes have gotten bigger — some told us they were feeling quite rosy, while others were even more deeply concerned.

Here’s what they told us:

The average answer stayed the same as last year: 2.8 degrees Celsius.

This year, however, the range got bigger. While last year every expert gave an answer between 2 and 3.5 degrees, this year’s high estimate was 5.5 degrees. Optimism also increased — at least for the climate investor this year who said 1.5 degrees.

An environmental researcher told us two main questions will determine how much temperatures actually rise: “Can we get our act together? And how sensitive is the climate to what we’re doing?”

An academic told us warming will be catastrophic if we continue on our current path. “But,” they said, “I think it’s never too late for us to become serious about addressing the climate crisis.”

Last year the average answer was 2039. This time, it’s 2044 — a significant increase. And once again, insiders diverged more than last year.

“It could be this year,” the environmental researcher told us. “The renewables rollout is exponentially growing. A lot of the stuff that China said that they would build is not being built, in terms of coal, etc.”

On the other extreme, two insiders think that global emissions may never peak.

“They will?” one replied when we asked them our question. “They won’t,” another told us. “They flatten out. They go down a little, then up a little. But they don’t peak, at least not before 2100.”

China — currently the world’s largest emitter — has seen its climate pollution plateau in the past few years. Our insiders have taken note.

Last year, 30% of insiders said China’s emissions would peak in the 2020s. This year, a slightly higher share of respondents agreed. Among researchers and reformers, a slight majority said the 2020s.

"I think they already have,” a climate investor told us.

Once again, the most common expert among respondents was that the United States will reach net zero in the 2060s. Yet as with the other questions, insiders’ views have drifted apart.

Last year, only one expert replied 2100 or later. This time, one in six experts said 2100 and beyond — or never.

“I just don’t see the politics aligning with that,” another academic told us. “Let’s say you would have to do substantial amounts of direct air capture, probably, at that point.”

Meanwhile, “God only knows!” one climate advocate told us.

The Heatmap Insiders Survey of 55 invited expert respondents was conducted by Heatmap News reporters during November and December 2025. Responses were collected via phone interviews. All participants were given the opportunity to record responses anonymously. Not all respondents answered all questions.

You’re out of free articles.

Subscribe to access Heatmap’s expert analysis of climate change, clean energy, and sustainability. Save $57 on an annual subscription, just $156 $99/year.
To continue reading
Create a free account or sign in to unlock more free articles.
or
Please enter an email address
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Q&A

The Health Researcher Diving into Data Center Policy

A conversation with Emma Uridge of the Kansas Health Institute.

The Q&A subject.
Heatmap Illustration

This week’s conversation is with Emma Uridge, analyst with the Kansas Health Institute. Uridge spent copious hours analyzing state and local laws on data center development to best understand how policymakers are responding to the potential environmental public health impacts of large AI infrastructure, including power and water. The report, which came out this week, also goes in depth into those health impacts. I reached out to her to discuss what she sees as must-watch territory for our readers on this emerging policy arena.

Our conversation was lightly edited for clarity.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Hotspots

Anti-Solar Protests Are the Cool New Campaign Move in Wisconsin

Plus more of the week’s big development fights.

The United States.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

1. Laramie County, Wyoming — Meta is fighting the fine it received in the Cheyenne data center water pollution controversy, and the conflict between the tech giant and the city’s small board of public utilities is continuing to spill out into the public.

  • Meta this week appealed the $10,000 fine that the board of public utilities issued over a rare bacteria found in Cheyenne’s sewer system. Meta is contesting any responsibility for the contaminant, claiming the board should’ve fined the construction company Fortis instead. You can read the full appeal here.
  • Afterwards, the board publicly released hundreds of pages of emails revealing how and why government employees linked the bacteria to Meta, specifically, including that officials tied the bacteria’s presence to the usage of closed-loop cooling systems for data centers. The emails also show local officials knew the water pollution was linked to the data center months earlier than previously thought. All the emails are available here.
  • Meanwhile, Cheyenne residents are attempting a long-shot bid to undo the annexation for the Microsoft data center I told you about. It’s unlikely to succeed because petitioners need to get about 10% of the last election cycle’s voting population to sign within 20 days… which at more than 2,000 people sounds all but impossible without a massive grassroots campaign.

2. Niagara County, New York — This county just rejected a solar project’s highway work permits in a show of retaliation against the state’s Office of Renewable Energy Siting.

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow
Spotlight

How the Trump Administration Turned a Solar Farm Into a Data Center

The local government of Boulder City, Nevada had previously rejected a proposal for the computing facility, which would draw power from the existing electricity supply.

Donald Trump and Nevada.
Heatmap Illustration/Getty Images

The U.S. government for the first time approved a data center on federal lands. What the Trump administration is pitching as a demonstration of bureaucratic speed and ambition in the era of artificial intelligence, however, is turning into the same sort of mysterious backroom deal that’s upsetting other communities.

On Monday, the Bureau of Land Management announced that it would allow a large AI data center to be built on a plot of federal land technically within the limits of Boulder City, Nevada. The approval was initially granted as a right-of-way in 2023 for the second phase of a solar project known as Townsite Solar, to be built by a joint venture between Skylar Opportunities LLC, a subsidiary of Houston energy trader Bill Perkins’ investment firm, and renewables developer Arevon. (Ironically, Perkins also just launched an ETF to profit from higher electricity demand.)

Keep reading...Show less
Yellow