You’re out of free articles.
Log in
To continue reading, log in to your account.
Create a Free Account
To unlock more free articles, please create a free account.
Sign In or Create an Account.
By continuing, you agree to the Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy
Welcome to Heatmap
Thank you for registering with Heatmap. Climate change is one of the greatest challenges of our lives, a force reshaping our economy, our politics, and our culture. We hope to be your trusted, friendly, and insightful guide to that transformation. Please enjoy your free articles. You can check your profile here .
subscribe to get Unlimited access
Offer for a Heatmap News Unlimited Access subscription; please note that your subscription will renew automatically unless you cancel prior to renewal. Cancellation takes effect at the end of your current billing period. We will let you know in advance of any price changes. Taxes may apply. Offer terms are subject to change.
Subscribe to get unlimited Access
Hey, you are out of free articles but you are only a few clicks away from full access. Subscribe below and take advantage of our introductory offer.
subscribe to get Unlimited access
Offer for a Heatmap News Unlimited Access subscription; please note that your subscription will renew automatically unless you cancel prior to renewal. Cancellation takes effect at the end of your current billing period. We will let you know in advance of any price changes. Taxes may apply. Offer terms are subject to change.
Create Your Account
Please Enter Your Password
Forgot your password?
Please enter the email address you use for your account so we can send you a link to reset your password:
News from Octopus Energy, Crusoe, Arbor, and Scalvy, plus more of the biggest money moves of the week.

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. It feels like overnight, every climate tech startup has suddenly become a data center startup. They’re either supplying power to hyperscalers, optimizing their operations, or divining ever more creative ways for them to circumvent the backlogged interconnection queue. Nearly all of the companies I highlight this week are helping data centers get up and running as quickly (not to mention cleanly) as possible, whether that was their original mission or not.
We’ve got Arbor, an energy startup built on rocket engine tech targeting data center customers as it signs a major power deal with GridMarket; power electronics startup Scalvy raising capital to bring its power electronics to server racks; renewable energy company and U.K. utility Octopus Energy acquiring a controlling stake in another VPP company that promises to help data centers come online faster; and data center developer Crusoe cutting two major battery deals at the CERAWeek energy conference.
In an attempt at balance, I’ve also included two pieces of non-data center news: A big fundraise for a fossil fuel industry-backed climate investment firm, and a report on a scrappy artificial intelligence startup, Everstar, which is partnering with the federal government to accelerate licensing for new nuclear reactors.
The energy company Arbor recently signed a deal with GridMarket, a company that helps facilitate the design and deployment of distributed energy projects for data centers and other industrial users, worth somewhere “in the single-digit billions of dollars,” Techcrunch reports. The nonbinding agreement will see Arbor providing up to 5 gigawatts of zero-carbon power to GridMarket beginning in 2029, contingent on its ability to hit manufacturing milestones.
Like so many other energy businesses, Arbor has adapted its strategy in response to the data center boom. Founded by SpaceX alums in 2021, the company developed a small, highly efficient turbine inspired by advances in rocket engine turbomachinery that gasifies biomass and combusts the resultant syngas with pure oxygen to generate electricity. The waste CO2 is then transported via pipeline for permanent storage. Because biomass has already sequestered carbon from the atmosphere, the process counts as carbon negative. But to meet soaring data center electricity demand, Arbor has now evolved its strategy to burn natural gas, too — making data center deployments easier to finance and build, while allowing projects to scale beyond the inherent fuel limitations of waste biomass.
Theoretically, Arbor’s data center customers could switch between different fuel sources if they so wish. “We see fuel flexibility as really important,” Arbor’s CEO Brad Hartwig told me earlier this month. “You can actually start at zero-emissions and then later go carbon negative. So we expect that will actually be a pretty compelling and central part of our offering, is this ability to not be locked into one fuel source.”
Arbor’s natural gas-fueled turbines will still be low-carbon because of the sequestered emissions, but not fully neutral due to unavoidable methane leaks in the natural gas supply chain. The 3D-printed machines ship as pre-assembled, 25-megawatt units, which can be combined into larger systems as needed. By 2030, the company aims to deliver over a gigawatt of new power capacity annually — still only a fifth of the total capacity outlined in its deal with GridMarket.
Like Arbor, distributed power company Scalvy wasn’t founded with data centers in mind. Its initial mission was to build modular powertrain electronics for electric vehicles, but the company has since pivoted to managing power flow on data center server racks. While power electronics typically take up their own shelves, Scalvy’s small, distributed units can work within the racks themselves to convert the AC power coming off the grid to DC directly at the load point, conserving space and thus allowing for higher-density computing.
Scalvy’s push into the booming AI data center market is looking like a wise move, as it announced an oversubscribed $13.9 million Series A funding round this week, which included participation from some climate tech venture firms such as Azolla Ventures and Climate Capital. The company hasn’t abandoned its roots, though, as it still lists electric mobility and energy storage among its priorities.
The value proposition is essentially the same across all these industries, Mohamed Badawy, Scalvy’s co-founder and CEO, explained in a statement — higher power without sacrificing space, cost, or system design. The startup will use this new capital to accelerate product certification, run field tests, and begin deployments with real-world customers. While Scalvy hasn’t disclosed any names, Azolla Ventures’ Matthew Nordan told me last year that the company has an agreement in place with a major data center operator that, as he put it, is “one of the large names that you would expect.”
About a decade ago, a multinational consortium of 12 oil and gas majors including ExxonMobil, Chevron, Saudi Aramco, and Shell, started the venture firm Climate Investment with a mission to back the next generation of infrastructure, which they supposedly believe will be “climate-based.” It can be hard to take the fossil fuel industry seriously on things like this, as the biggest companies in the space continually walk back their climate commitments and investments. But this week, Climate Investment announced a new commitment to climate initiatives — a $450 million growth fund intended to scale-up decarbonization technologies and help them bridge the dreaded “missing middle,” the gap in climate financing between a company’s early-stage funding rounds and its commercial deployment.
This is the firm’s second fund. The first — a $1 billion vehicle — focused primarily on carbon capture and storage as well as methane abatement across the natural gas value chain. This second fund, however, suggests a shift in priorities. Its four initial investments span AI-enabled infrastructure modeling, data center cooling systems, offshore geospatial data collection, and vapor recovery tech for oilfield emissions control.
To date, Climate Investment has backed more than 40 companies that it says have delivered over 150 million metric tons of cumulative emissions reductions.
Renewables-focused Octopus Energy has extended its tentacles across the U.K. to become the state’s largest energy supplier. Now it’s looking to further expand its footprint in the U.S., where it’s currently confined to Texas’ deregulated electricity market. With its recent acquisition of a majority stake in the distributed energy resource platform Uplight, Octopus is now positioned to become a key partner for a whole host of U.S. utilities seeking innovative ways to manage the rapid growth in data center-driven electricity demand.
Uplight, last valued at $1.5 billion in 2021, builds platforms for utilities and energy providers that aggregate distributed energy resources into so-called virtual power plants. VPPs respond in real-time to grid demands by ramping these distributed resources up or down, coordinating them to operate like traditional power plants while also shifting energy to off-peak hours as needed. If data center operators can finance or otherwise support the buildout of VPP infrastructure in their communities, they can essentially bring their own capacity to the market, making it faster to get online by avoiding the need to build additional energy infrastructure.
Octopus now has access to Uplight’s 85 utility partners and 8.5 gigawatts of distributed energy resources. Also participating in the deal was Schneider Electric, a previous investor that will remain a minority partner in Uplight, although the deal amount and other financial details have not been disclosed.
Data center developer Crusoe — which is reportedly eyeing a pre-IPO fundraise — cut two big deals at the CERAWeek conference this week. The first is a contract with Form Energy to buy 120 megawatts of its iron-air batteries, which would provide 12 gigawatt-hours of multi-day battery storage for AI data centers starting in 2027. Form — which has raised $1.4 billion to date — is on a tear recently, having just announced that it’s going to build a 30-gigawatt-hour battery for a Google data center in Minnesota.
Second, Crusoe announced an expansion of its existing partnership with the battery recycling-turned-energy storage company Redwood Materials, which recently raised a $425 million Series E round following its pivot to using second-life EV batteries for data center power. Redwood is already operating its first microgrid pilot in partnership with Crusoe in Nevada, where a 12-megawatt battery system with 63 megawatt-hours of energy storage supplies four of Crusoe’s modular, off-grid, and renewable-powered data centers.
Having deemed this initial deployment a success, Crusoe now plans to add an additional 20 modular data centers onsite, increasing the total compute capacity by nearly sevenfold.
Taken together, these two deals underscore just how far Crusoe has come from its original model of utilizing stranded natural gas from oilfields — which would otherwise be flared — to power bitcoin-mining operations.
Crusoe didn’t disclose terms for either deal.
Everstar, a startup building AI software to help nuclear companies speed up their regulatory timelines, announced a collaboration with the Department of Energy, multiple national labs, and Microsoft as a part of DOE’s Genesis Mission, a program designed to leverage advanced AI and other tools to accelerate scientific discoveries, including how energy systems are designed, tested, and deployed.
To demonstrate its capabilities, Everstar converted a required DOE safety analysis document into Nuclear Regulator Commission licensing documents in a single day — a process that typically takes a team four to six weeks. “We’re often looking at like 5,000- to 10,000-page documents submitted ad nauseam, until you reach 2 million pages to get approval,” Everstar’s CEO and founder Kevin Kong told me. Licensing applications are the first problem the startup has trained its models to handle, but it aims to extend into other areas of the nuclear value chain such as streamlining reactor design, plant operations, and manufacturing workflows.
“The ultimate goal of the company is to reduce costs of building American reactors on American soil by an order of magnitude, so we’ve got a much longer journey ahead of us,” Kong told me.
Log in
To continue reading, log in to your account.
Create a Free Account
To unlock more free articles, please create a free account.
Current conditions: Colorado is digging out of its biggest snowstorm of the season, which dumped another six inches on Denver yesterday • Heavy rain and mudflows in Tajikistan have killed at least four people this week • Spring showers are drenching the Croatian island of Ugljan in the Kornati archipelago.
Electricity prices went up again last month, but as Heatmap’s Emily Pontecorvo reported this morning, it’s not because of the Iran War. The latest spike, which appears in a data update released this morning in Heatmap and MIT’s Electricity Price Hub, shows that prices were 6.7% higher, on average, than the same month the previous year. The 12-month trailing average, a measure that smooths out seasonal fluctuations in rates, was up 6.5% from a year ago.
While both of these stats represent new peaks — as is almost always the case with electricity prices over time — the overall growth in prices in April was not unusual, Emily wrote. “National average electricity prices have been increasing at a similar rate this year as they have during the past five years, with the exception of 2022, when there was a significant spike in the cost of natural gas. Natural gas plants generate the largest proportion of U.S. power, and the cost of the fuel has an outsized influence on our electricity prices.”
But some places, such as New Jersey and Washington, D.C., saw 21% and 25% increases, respectively, in their 12-month trailing averages due to strained dynamics in PJM, the electricity market they are part of, where power demand is outstripping supply. But Emily writes that: “The new April data also shows how sometimes electricity prices undergo big fluctuations for more arbitrary, and ultimately temporary reasons.” For example, some states such as California and Massachusetts issued dividends or rebates that reduced bills during hotter months when electricity costs typically rise.
See the data for yourself here..
We all know that the backlash to data centers is mounting. As I reported for Heatmap in February, the proportion of voters who strongly oppose developing server farms grew by an eye-popping 50% in just a few months. Now Heatmap’s Robinson Meyer has some exclusive data via our intelligence platform Heatmap Pro that really puts a fine point on how effective that political pushback has become. At least 20 proposed data centers were canceled amid local pushback during the first three months of 2026, smashing a record set only in the previous quarter. “The cancellations,” Rob wrote, “reveal the rapidly expanding backlash to data center construction has not yet peaked.” About 100 new data center fights were also added to Heatmap Pro’s database during the first quarter, another new record.
It’s no wonder why. Even the data centers owned by the richest man in the world aren’t fulfilling basic promises made to voters about the sustainability of the projects. Elon Musk pledged two years ago to build a state-of-the-art water recycling plant in Memphis, Tennessee, to guarantee that his xAI servers wouldn’t deplete the city’s groundwater. Now that Musk’s first data center dedicated to his AI chatbot is up and running, construction on the recycling facility has come to an abrupt halt.
Add this to the list of achievements for China’s booming offshore wind industry. China Three Gorges Corporation announced that it has completed the installation of a 16-megawatt floating offshore wind turbine off the coast of Guangdong province, in what offshoreWIND.biz described as “the world’s largest single-unit floating wind turbine platform.” The pilot project is located in waters nearly 44 miles offshore at depths of close to 165 feet. The developer called the installation a milestone toward deep-sea floating wind technology that could harness stronger air flows and expand the footprint of offshore wind into areas of the Pacific coastline where the continental shelf drops off steeply and close to shore. As in sectors such as solar panels and batteries, the floating wind industry is driven by fierce internal competition in China.
In the U.S., meanwhile, the developer that had planned to build the nation’s first floating offshore wind farm off central California just took a payout from the Trump administration in exchange for abandoning its federal lease. Golden State Wind was among two companies that followed French energy giant TotalEnergies in taking refunds from the Department of the Interior while promising to halt all offshore wind development in the future, as I wrote last month. And as I told you on Tuesday, California regulators are now investigating the developer.
Sign up to receive Heatmap AM in your inbox every morning:
As the nation’s largest federally owned utility, the Tennessee Valley Authority is, in many ways, the closest thing the U.S. has to one of the giant state companies that handle nuclear construction in countries with major atomic energy sectors such as France, South Korea, or Japan. The TVA has recently refashioned itself as a testing ground for new American reactor technologies. The world’s second BWRX-300, the 300-megawatt boiling water reactor from GE Vernova Hitachi Nuclear Energy, is set to be built at the TVA’s Clinch River site. The first power purchase agreement between a next-generation reactor developer and a U.S. utility was Kairos Power’s Google-backed deal to sell electricity from its first commercial molten salt reactor to the TVA. The White House is even giving the TVA an early look at new rules coming out of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. So it’s fitting that now the TVA is generating far more electricity from nuclear energy than this time last year. The utility’s nuclear fleet supplied 41% of its power in the first half of this year, compared to 31% in the same six-month window of 2025, Utility Dive reported. The milestone comes as Mike Skaggs, the TVA’s interim chief executive since CEO Don Moul announced his retirement last month, names nuclear as a top priority.
Type One Energy, a U.S.-based fusion company backed by Bill Gates’ Breakthrough Energy Ventures, has made a deal to develop its first commercial power plant in the United Kingdom within a decade. The consortium includes the U.S. engineering firm Aecom and the British fusion supplier Tokamak Energy. Type One is already in “very early conversations with several potential customers,” CEO Chris Mowry told the Financial Times. The move comes just weeks after Gates’ fission company, TerraPower, began construction on its first plant in Wyoming, as I wrote last month.
Meanwhile, another clean energy venture in the U.K. is going under. Morrow Batteries, a lithium-ion manufacturer in Europe, filed for bankruptcy Wednesday. “It’s a tough outcome after years of building with over €400 million invested, strong technology, real products in the field, and an outstanding team that stands together through tremendous challenges,” CEO Jon Fold von Bülow wrote in a post on LinkedIn. “I firmly believe this is not the end.” He said he’s hoping to sell to a buyer who will take the technology forward.

I’ll let this chart from the sustainability research service Watershed speak for itself. As Watershed’s head of science John Bistline put it on X: “Texas just passed California in utility-scale solar. And it's not close in wind or energy storage.”
The cost of electricity goes up like clockwork.
Electricity prices continued to climb higher in April, according to Heatmap and MIT’s Electricity Price Hub. Prices in April 2026 were 6.7% higher, on average, than the same month the previous year. The 12-month trailing average, a measure that smooths out seasonal fluctuations in rates, was up 6.5% from a year ago.
While both of these stats represent new peaks — as is almost always the case with electricity prices over time — the overall growth in prices in April was not unusual. National average electricity prices have been increasing at a similar rate this year as they have during the past five years, with the exception of 2022, when there was a significant spike in the cost of natural gas. Natural gas plants generate the largest proportion of U.S. power, and the cost of the fuel has an outsized influence on our electricity prices.
Although Trump’s war with Iran has inflated gasoline prices and the cost of other crude oil-based products, perhaps counterintuitively, it has not had any effect on U.S. power prices. Unlike in Europe and Asia, where the Iran war has led to natural gas shortages and price spikes, the U.S. is mostly self-sufficient when it comes to natural gas. The only way the war would affect our power prices is if it led to an increase in exports, tightening our domestic supply. That’s not possible any time soon — our export facilities are already at max capacity. “We couldn't export more gas, even if we wanted to,” Ryan Kellogg, an energy economist at the University of Chicago, told me.
The picture of what’s happening with U.S. electricity prices changes again, however, when we zoom in to the state level. Even though the national average growth rate is comparable to the past several years, there are a handful of individual states that are seeing much more rapid increases.
New Jersey and Washington, D.C., for instance, saw 21% and 25% increases, respectively, in their 12-month trailing averages between May 2025 and April 2026, compared to a national average increase of 6%. These areas are seeing more rapid growth due to the strained dynamics in PJM, the electricity market they are a part of, where electricity demand is outpacing supply.
The new April data also shows how sometimes electricity prices undergo big fluctuations for more arbitrary, and ultimately temporary reasons. In California, for example, rates were about the same over the first three months of this year as the same months in 2025, but in April they were more than 50% higher. That’s because last year, Californians received a big bill credit in the month of April — a sort of dividend from the state’s carbon tax. For this year, regulators voted to shift that payment to August, when residents’ electricity bills are typically higher due to air conditioning.
Similarly, one of the largest month-to-month price spikes in the data set was in Massachusetts, where the utility Eversource’s electric rates jumped 36% between March and April. The utility had agreed to artificially lower its rates in February and March after the governor asked for rate relief during the winter months. In April, rates sprang back up.
That’s why the 12-month trailing average is a helpful metric — it can be deceiving to look at how much rates and bills change on a monthly basis.
The number of data centers canceled after pushback set a record in the first quarter of the year, new data from Heatmap Pro shows.
Data centers are getting larger and larger. But even so, few are as large as the Sentinel Grove Technology Park, a proposed data center near Port St. Lucie, Florida.
The proposed facility — which became known as Project Jarvis — was set to be built on old agricultural land. It would use up to 1 gigawatt of electricity, enough to power a mid-size city, and bring in up to $13.5 billion in investment to the county.
The project was immediately controversial. But its developers anticipated issues: They would build their own self-contained, self-provided water facilities to service the project, and they agreed to set its 60-foot buildings back far enough from the road so that they couldn’t be seen by drivers.
It wasn’t enough. The project lost a key vote in the planning board in October. And in February, Project Jarvis’s developers withdrew their land use application entirely after Governor Ron DeSantis proposed AI regulation in the statehouse.
The facility was the largest data center project canceled after facing opposition in the first quarter of 2026. But it wasn’t the only one.
At least 20 proposed data center projects were canceled after local pushback during the first three months of 2026, smashing a record set only in the previous quarter, according to a review of press accounts, public records, and project announcements conducted by Heatmap Pro.
These canceled projects accounted for more than $41.7 billion in investment and represented at least 3.5 gigawatts of electricity demand.
The cancellations reveal the rapidly expanding backlash to data center construction has not yet peaked. From Georgia to Pennsylvania, locals have rebelled against newly proposed data centers, even when the planned facilities are not planning to run artificial intelligence models.

If anything, fights over data centers are surging now. Heatmap Pro’s researchers added roughly 100 new data center fights to their database during the first three months of the past year, a new record.
These fights are succeeding in terminating projects. Last year, roughly 25 data center projects were canceled nationwide after facing some type of local opposition, according to Heatmap Pro data. The country is likely to break that record in 2026 over the next few weeks, our data suggests — only five months into the year.
At least $85 billion in data center projects have been canceled over the past three years, according to Heatmap Pro data.

These numbers haven’t been previously reported. Over the past year, researchers at our intelligence platform Heatmap Pro have conducted a comprehensive national survey of local opposition to data center construction. They have regularly called every U.S. county to tally data center cancellations and any new rules limiting data center construction.
This data is normally available to companies and individuals who subscribe to Heatmap Pro, but we periodically publish a high-level summary of this data. We last released our results in January.